KOTA LHOKSEUMAWE
493rd out of 514
Results for KOTA LHOKSEUMAWE
- City
- ACEH
Overall Score
![GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)](https://rgss.verzview.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ico-8.svg)
GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)
Population (thousands)
Land Area (km2)
KOTA LHOKSEUMAWE
Pillar and Dimension Ranks
Pillar and Dimension Scores
Capabilities
-0.31
Accountability
-0.29
Financial Management
-0.26
Public Service
-0.52
Technology and Innovation
-0.17
Inputs
-0.20
Financial Resources
-0.25
Human Resources
-0.15
Performance
0.00
Attracting Investment
-0.11
Economic Prosperity
-0.13
Employment
0.11
Income & Poverty
-0.08
Education
0.08
Health
0.01
Gender Equality
-0.01
Environmental Quality
0.15
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
0.02
Geographic Condition
0.59
Capabilities
510th
Accountability
460th
Financial Management
507th
Public Service
503rd
Technology and Innovation
413th
Inputs
453rd
Financial Resources
471st
Human Resources
371st
Performance
286th
Attracting Investment
458th
Economic Prosperity
429th
Employment
108th
Income & Poverty
407th
Education
95th
Health
292nd
Gender Equality
279th
Environmental Quality
113th
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
295th
Geographic Condition
264th
Foundational Environment is not scored; it serves as a context-adjustment layer. The adjustment operates at the dimension level for simplicity: for every dimension within Inputs, Capabilities and Performance, each region’s score is compared against the scores of structurally similar peers, so that local governments are assessed in context rather than ranked on raw scores alone. The adjusted scores are the same as if they were adjusted at indicator-metric level.
Download Rankings
Download this individual profile for a consolidated view of the selected regency (kabupaten) or city (kota) overall score, national rank, and performance across the framework. The downloadable file provides the profile data in an accessible format for further reference, comparison, and analysis.
