KAB. BIAK NUMFOR
386th out of 514
Results for KAB. BIAK NUMFOR
- Regency
- PAPUA
Overall Score
![GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)](https://rgss.verzview.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ico-8.svg)
GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)
Population (thousands)
Land Area (km2)
KAB. BIAK NUMFOR
Pillar and Dimension Ranks
Pillar and Dimension Scores
Capabilities
-0.18
Accountability
-0.14
Financial Management
-0.10
Public Service
0.00
Technology and Innovation
-0.49
Inputs
-0.04
Financial Resources
-0.02
Human Resources
-0.06
Performance
-0.02
Attracting Investment
-0.08
Economic Prosperity
-0.11
Employment
0.22
Income & Poverty
-0.49
Education
0.21
Health
-0.16
Gender Equality
0.02
Environmental Quality
0.22
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
0.01
Geographic Condition
0.47
Capabilities
462nd
Accountability
381st
Financial Management
400th
Public Service
288th
Technology and Innovation
513th
Inputs
252nd
Financial Resources
251st
Human Resources
272nd
Performance
355th
Attracting Investment
365th
Economic Prosperity
404th
Employment
45th
Income & Poverty
502nd
Education
9th
Health
424th
Gender Equality
238th
Environmental Quality
68th
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
382nd
Geographic Condition
395th
Foundational Environment is not scored; it serves as a context-adjustment layer. The adjustment operates at the dimension level for simplicity: for every dimension within Inputs, Capabilities and Performance, each region’s score is compared against the scores of structurally similar peers, so that local governments are assessed in context rather than ranked on raw scores alone. The adjusted scores are the same as if they were adjusted at indicator-metric level.
Download Rankings
Download this individual profile for a consolidated view of the selected regency (kabupaten) or city (kota) overall score, national rank, and performance across the framework. The downloadable file provides the profile data in an accessible format for further reference, comparison, and analysis.
