KAB. FAKFAK
381st out of 514
Results for KAB. FAKFAK
- Regency
- PAPUA BARAT
Overall Score
![GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)](https://rgss.verzview.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ico-8.svg)
GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)
Population (thousands)
Land Area (km2)
KAB. FAKFAK
Pillar and Dimension Ranks
Pillar and Dimension Scores
Capabilities
-0.15
Accountability
-0.04
Financial Management
-0.12
Public Service
-0.03
Technology and Innovation
-0.41
Inputs
-0.10
Financial Resources
-0.07
Human Resources
-0.13
Performance
0.02
Attracting Investment
0.00
Economic Prosperity
-0.14
Employment
0.17
Income & Poverty
-0.32
Education
0.17
Health
-0.15
Gender Equality
0.02
Environmental Quality
0.38
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
0.10
Geographic Condition
0.66
Capabilities
435th
Accountability
315th
Financial Management
417th
Public Service
319th
Technology and Innovation
506th
Inputs
330th
Financial Resources
295th
Human Resources
349th
Performance
236th
Attracting Investment
150th
Economic Prosperity
437th
Employment
69th
Income & Poverty
485th
Education
23rd
Health
415th
Gender Equality
229th
Environmental Quality
5th
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
141st
Geographic Condition
153rd
Foundational Environment is not scored; it serves as a context-adjustment layer. The adjustment operates at the dimension level for simplicity: for every dimension within Inputs, Capabilities and Performance, each region’s score is compared against the scores of structurally similar peers, so that local governments are assessed in context rather than ranked on raw scores alone. The adjusted scores are the same as if they were adjusted at indicator-metric level.
Download Rankings
Download this individual profile for a consolidated view of the selected regency (kabupaten) or city (kota) overall score, national rank, and performance across the framework. The downloadable file provides the profile data in an accessible format for further reference, comparison, and analysis.
