KAB. ACEH TIMUR
208th out of 514
Results for KAB. ACEH TIMUR
- Regency
- ACEH
Overall Score
![GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)](https://rgss.verzview.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ico-8.svg)
GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)
Population (thousands)
Land Area (km2)
KAB. ACEH TIMUR
Pillar and Dimension Ranks
Pillar and Dimension Scores
Capabilities
-0.12
Accountability
-0.12
Financial Management
-0.09
Public Service
-0.23
Technology and Innovation
-0.06
Inputs
0.15
Financial Resources
0.09
Human Resources
0.20
Performance
0.02
Attracting Investment
-0.06
Economic Prosperity
-0.02
Employment
0.26
Income & Poverty
0.09
Education
0.01
Health
-0.04
Gender Equality
-0.23
Environmental Quality
0.17
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
0.01
Geographic Condition
0.43
Capabilities
411th
Accountability
365th
Financial Management
394th
Public Service
433rd
Technology and Innovation
332nd
Inputs
106th
Financial Resources
175th
Human Resources
75th
Performance
203rd
Attracting Investment
280th
Economic Prosperity
292nd
Employment
34th
Income & Poverty
149th
Education
221st
Health
347th
Gender Equality
482nd
Environmental Quality
99th
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
362nd
Geographic Condition
430th
Foundational Environment is not scored; it serves as a context-adjustment layer. The adjustment operates at the dimension level for simplicity: for every dimension within Inputs, Capabilities and Performance, each region’s score is compared against the scores of structurally similar peers, so that local governments are assessed in context rather than ranked on raw scores alone. The adjusted scores are the same as if they were adjusted at indicator-metric level.
Download Rankings
Download this individual profile for a consolidated view of the selected regency (kabupaten) or city (kota) overall score, national rank, and performance across the framework. The downloadable file provides the profile data in an accessible format for further reference, comparison, and analysis.
