KAB. BOALEMO
488th out of 514
Results for KAB. BOALEMO
- Regency
- GORONTALO
Overall Score
![GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)](https://rgss.verzview.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ico-8.svg)
GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)
Population (thousands)
Land Area (km2)
KAB. BOALEMO
Pillar and Dimension Ranks
Pillar and Dimension Scores
Capabilities
-0.12
Accountability
-0.27
Financial Management
-0.02
Public Service
-0.11
Technology and Innovation
-0.07
Inputs
-0.22
Financial Resources
-0.25
Human Resources
-0.19
Performance
-0.15
Attracting Investment
-0.09
Economic Prosperity
-0.07
Employment
-0.05
Income & Poverty
-0.30
Education
-0.10
Health
-0.18
Gender Equality
-0.03
Environmental Quality
-0.39
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
0.00
Geographic Condition
0.69
Capabilities
400th
Accountability
451st
Financial Management
297th
Public Service
374th
Technology and Innovation
335th
Inputs
479th
Financial Resources
474th
Human Resources
432nd
Performance
493rd
Attracting Investment
410th
Economic Prosperity
356th
Employment
301st
Income & Poverty
481st
Education
441st
Health
433rd
Gender Equality
300th
Environmental Quality
498th
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
426th
Geographic Condition
122nd
Foundational Environment is not scored; it serves as a context-adjustment layer. The adjustment operates at the dimension level for simplicity: for every dimension within Inputs, Capabilities and Performance, each region’s score is compared against the scores of structurally similar peers, so that local governments are assessed in context rather than ranked on raw scores alone. The adjusted scores are the same as if they were adjusted at indicator-metric level.
Download Rankings
Download this individual profile for a consolidated view of the selected regency (kabupaten) or city (kota) overall score, national rank, and performance across the framework. The downloadable file provides the profile data in an accessible format for further reference, comparison, and analysis.
