KAB. NIAS UTARA
418th out of 514
Results for KAB. NIAS UTARA
- Regency
- SUMATERA UTARA
Overall Score
![GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)](https://rgss.verzview.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ico-8.svg)
GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)
Population (thousands)
Land Area (km2)
KAB. NIAS UTARA
Pillar and Dimension Ranks
Pillar and Dimension Scores
Capabilities
0.05
Accountability
0.14
Financial Management
-0.13
Public Service
0.15
Technology and Innovation
0.03
Inputs
-0.24
Financial Resources
-0.30
Human Resources
-0.18
Performance
-0.09
Attracting Investment
-0.01
Economic Prosperity
-0.18
Employment
-0.16
Income & Poverty
-0.14
Education
-0.02
Health
0.01
Gender Equality
-0.14
Environmental Quality
-0.11
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
0.01
Geographic Condition
0.23
Capabilities
194th
Accountability
146th
Financial Management
429th
Public Service
133rd
Technology and Innovation
228th
Inputs
490th
Financial Resources
493rd
Human Resources
422nd
Performance
471st
Attracting Investment
167th
Economic Prosperity
471st
Employment
456th
Income & Poverty
448th
Education
314th
Health
293rd
Gender Equality
439th
Environmental Quality
401st
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
343rd
Geographic Condition
501st
Foundational Environment is not scored; it serves as a context-adjustment layer. The adjustment operates at the dimension level for simplicity: for every dimension within Inputs, Capabilities and Performance, each region’s score is compared against the scores of structurally similar peers, so that local governments are assessed in context rather than ranked on raw scores alone. The adjusted scores are the same as if they were adjusted at indicator-metric level.
Download Rankings
Download this individual profile for a consolidated view of the selected regency (kabupaten) or city (kota) overall score, national rank, and performance across the framework. The downloadable file provides the profile data in an accessible format for further reference, comparison, and analysis.
