KAB. PIDIE JAYA
372nd out of 514
Results for KAB. PIDIE JAYA
- Regency
- ACEH
Overall Score
![GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)](https://rgss.verzview.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ico-8.svg)
GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)
Population (thousands)
Land Area (km2)
KAB. PIDIE JAYA
Pillar and Dimension Ranks
Pillar and Dimension Scores
Capabilities
-0.03
Accountability
0.23
Financial Management
-0.04
Public Service
-0.25
Technology and Innovation
-0.06
Inputs
-0.22
Financial Resources
-0.21
Human Resources
-0.23
Performance
0.03
Attracting Investment
-0.08
Economic Prosperity
0.03
Employment
0.02
Income & Poverty
-0.03
Education
0.20
Health
0.00
Gender Equality
-0.03
Environmental Quality
0.16
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
0.01
Geographic Condition
0.60
Capabilities
298th
Accountability
81st
Financial Management
335th
Public Service
446th
Technology and Innovation
323rd
Inputs
478th
Financial Resources
449th
Human Resources
479th
Performance
164th
Attracting Investment
337th
Economic Prosperity
219th
Employment
199th
Income & Poverty
345th
Education
10th
Health
306th
Gender Equality
306th
Environmental Quality
108th
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
320th
Geographic Condition
253rd
Foundational Environment is not scored; it serves as a context-adjustment layer. The adjustment operates at the dimension level for simplicity: for every dimension within Inputs, Capabilities and Performance, each region’s score is compared against the scores of structurally similar peers, so that local governments are assessed in context rather than ranked on raw scores alone. The adjusted scores are the same as if they were adjusted at indicator-metric level.
Download Rankings
Download this individual profile for a consolidated view of the selected regency (kabupaten) or city (kota) overall score, national rank, and performance across the framework. The downloadable file provides the profile data in an accessible format for further reference, comparison, and analysis.
