KAB. PIDIE
189th out of 514
Results for KAB. PIDIE
- Regency
- ACEH
Overall Score
![GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)](https://rgss.verzview.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ico-8.svg)
GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)
Population (thousands)
Land Area (km2)
KAB. PIDIE
Pillar and Dimension Ranks
Pillar and Dimension Scores
Capabilities
-0.09
Accountability
-0.01
Financial Management
-0.01
Public Service
-0.30
Technology and Innovation
-0.02
Inputs
0.12
Financial Resources
0.12
Human Resources
0.12
Performance
0.04
Attracting Investment
-0.08
Economic Prosperity
0.02
Employment
0.15
Income & Poverty
0.06
Education
0.14
Health
-0.26
Gender Equality
0.04
Environmental Quality
0.27
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
0.02
Geographic Condition
0.50
Capabilities
362nd
Accountability
289th
Financial Management
293rd
Public Service
457th
Technology and Innovation
283rd
Inputs
116th
Financial Resources
140th
Human Resources
110th
Performance
126th
Attracting Investment
336th
Economic Prosperity
229th
Employment
84th
Income & Poverty
211th
Education
39th
Health
467th
Gender Equality
208th
Environmental Quality
36th
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
300th
Geographic Condition
363rd
Foundational Environment is not scored; it serves as a context-adjustment layer. The adjustment operates at the dimension level for simplicity: for every dimension within Inputs, Capabilities and Performance, each region’s score is compared against the scores of structurally similar peers, so that local governments are assessed in context rather than ranked on raw scores alone. The adjusted scores are the same as if they were adjusted at indicator-metric level.
Download Rankings
Download this individual profile for a consolidated view of the selected regency (kabupaten) or city (kota) overall score, national rank, and performance across the framework. The downloadable file provides the profile data in an accessible format for further reference, comparison, and analysis.
