KAB. WAROPEN
473rd out of 514
Results for KAB. WAROPEN
- Regency
- PAPUA
Overall Score
![GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)](https://rgss.verzview.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ico-8.svg)
GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)
Population (thousands)
Land Area (km2)
KAB. WAROPEN
Pillar and Dimension Ranks
Pillar and Dimension Scores
Capabilities
-0.20
Accountability
-0.43
Financial Management
-0.20
Public Service
0.02
Technology and Innovation
-0.17
Inputs
-0.11
Financial Resources
-0.21
Human Resources
-0.01
Performance
-0.13
Attracting Investment
0.13
Economic Prosperity
-0.22
Employment
0.00
Income & Poverty
-0.50
Education
0.06
Health
-0.26
Gender Equality
-0.46
Environmental Quality
0.26
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
0.01
Geographic Condition
0.42
Capabilities
468th
Accountability
489th
Financial Management
485th
Public Service
250th
Technology and Innovation
421st
Inputs
347th
Financial Resources
450th
Human Resources
204th
Performance
488th
Attracting Investment
60th
Economic Prosperity
485th
Employment
230th
Income & Poverty
504th
Education
143rd
Health
470th
Gender Equality
509th
Environmental Quality
42nd
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
351st
Geographic Condition
435th
Foundational Environment is not scored; it serves as a context-adjustment layer. The adjustment operates at the dimension level for simplicity: for every dimension within Inputs, Capabilities and Performance, each region’s score is compared against the scores of structurally similar peers, so that local governments are assessed in context rather than ranked on raw scores alone. The adjusted scores are the same as if they were adjusted at indicator-metric level.
Download Rankings
Download this individual profile for a consolidated view of the selected regency (kabupaten) or city (kota) overall score, national rank, and performance across the framework. The downloadable file provides the profile data in an accessible format for further reference, comparison, and analysis.
