KOTA SUBULUSSALAM
509th out of 514
Results for KOTA SUBULUSSALAM
- City
- ACEH
Overall Score
![GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)](https://rgss.verzview.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ico-8.svg)
GDP Per Capita [Rp] (thousands)
Population (thousands)
Land Area (km2)
KOTA SUBULUSSALAM
Pillar and Dimension Ranks
Pillar and Dimension Scores
Capabilities
-0.21
Accountability
-0.28
Financial Management
-0.25
Public Service
-0.10
Technology and Innovation
-0.21
Inputs
-0.29
Financial Resources
-0.36
Human Resources
-0.23
Performance
-0.13
Attracting Investment
-0.11
Economic Prosperity
-0.37
Employment
-0.13
Income & Poverty
-0.06
Education
-0.11
Health
-0.47
Gender Equality
-0.11
Environmental Quality
0.29
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
0.02
Geographic Condition
0.79
Capabilities
478th
Accountability
453rd
Financial Management
503rd
Public Service
365th
Technology and Innovation
443rd
Inputs
506th
Financial Resources
508th
Human Resources
477th
Performance
489th
Attracting Investment
479th
Economic Prosperity
514th
Employment
424th
Income & Poverty
392nd
Education
466th
Health
500th
Gender Equality
408th
Environmental Quality
31st
Foundational Environment
Natural Resources
290th
Geographic Condition
36th
Foundational Environment is not scored; it serves as a context-adjustment layer. The adjustment operates at the dimension level for simplicity: for every dimension within Inputs, Capabilities and Performance, each region’s score is compared against the scores of structurally similar peers, so that local governments are assessed in context rather than ranked on raw scores alone. The adjusted scores are the same as if they were adjusted at indicator-metric level.
Download Rankings
Download this individual profile for a consolidated view of the selected regency (kabupaten) or city (kota) overall score, national rank, and performance across the framework. The downloadable file provides the profile data in an accessible format for further reference, comparison, and analysis.
